Dear Shammi Silva,
I write to you at a moment of deep frustration and sadness for Sri Lanka cricket. Our early elimination from the ongoing World Cup has once again exposed the widening gap between our proud past and our uncertain present. This exit is not an isolated disappointment. It is part of a continuing pattern that has unfolded during your tenure as President of Sri Lanka Cricket.
Under your leadership, Sri Lanka has now endured repeated failures at major global tournaments. Since 2015, we have not reached the semi final stage of a major world event. For a nation that once stood tall among the giants of the game, this is a painful statistic. Each campaign begins with hope and ends with explanations. Each restructuring is presented as a turning point. Yet the results remain unchanged.
I acknowledge that efforts have been made. Coaches have been appointed and replaced. Selection panels have been reshuffled. Captains have changed with alarming frequency. Infrastructure projects have been launched. Large investments have gone into facilities and administrative expansion. You have cultivated strong relationships with other cricket boards and with the International Cricket Council. You have defended the autonomy of the board in difficult political circumstances. These actions are visible and, in some respects, commendable.
However, none of this activity has produced sustained excellence on the field.
The core issue is not effort. It is direction. While other cricketing nations have embraced modern systems based on data analytics, sports science, fitness benchmarks, psychological preparation, and structured talent pathways, Sri Lanka appears trapped in cycles of short term decision making. We react instead of plan. We reshuffle instead of rebuild. We announce initiatives instead of delivering outcomes.
The result is a team that reflects instability. On one day, we produce a stirring victory against a top ranked side. On the next, we collapse meekly against opposition we once dominated. This is not unpredictability born of flair. It is inconsistency rooted in structural weakness.
You have publicly stated in the past that the funds of Sri Lanka Cricket are not public funds and that the board is not answerable to everyone. Yet cricket in this country survives because of its people. Spectators who fill stadiums are the lifeblood of the game. Television audiences generate broadcast revenue. Sponsors invest because of the emotional connection between the team and its supporters. If public trust erodes, the financial strength of the board will inevitably weaken as well.
It was disheartening to witness players being booed by their own supporters. Sri Lankan fans are among the most loyal in the world. They have stood by the team through rebuilding phases, political uncertainty, and generational change. Even now, they continue to attend matches despite anticipating disappointment. That loyalty should never be taken for granted.
Cricket in Sri Lanka is not merely entertainment. It is part of our national identity. It has united communities, inspired youth, and brought global recognition to a small island nation. To see it reduced to celebrating effort rather than achievement is deeply troubling.
This brings me to a fundamental question. Have you and your committee conducted an honest self assessment of your own performance? Coaches are evaluated by results. Captains are judged by wins and losses. Players are dropped for underperformance. Should administrators not be subject to the same standards?
Leadership is not measured solely by financial statements or completed construction projects. It is measured by whether the core mission is fulfilled. The core mission of Sri Lanka Cricket is to develop and sustain a competitive national team that reflects the highest standards of professionalism, discipline, and excellence. By that measure, the record over the past decade raises serious concerns.
A generation ago, Sri Lanka was respected and feared. We produced cricketers who combined skill with resilience and intelligence. Today, we appear satisfied with occasional flashes of brilliance surrounded by long stretches of mediocrity. The hunger that once defined our cricket seems diluted. The system that once nurtured match winners appears fragmented.
This decline cannot be attributed solely to players. Administrations set culture. Administrations define accountability. Administrations create long-term vision. When instability persists year after year, responsibility must extend beyond the dressing room.
Therefore, I urge you to consider whether the time has come for leadership renewal. Stepping aside is not an admission of personal failure. It can be an act of courage and responsibility. New leadership can bring fresh thinking, new energy, and a reimagined strategy grounded in transparency and long-term planning.
Sri Lanka cricket now mirrors its governance. It appears inconsistent, reactive, and uncertain. That reflection is painful but necessary to acknowledge. Our players deserve a stable structure that allows them to grow. Our young talents deserve a system that prioritises development over politics. Our supporters deserve a team and an administration they can trust without reservation.
This letter is written not in anger but in profound concern. The game that has given so much joy to our nation is at a crossroads. Continuing along the same path while expecting different results will only deepen the crisis.
For the sake of the future of Sri Lanka cricket, I respectfully ask you to reflect deeply on your tenure and to consider whether new stewardship is required at this critical juncture. True leadership is demonstrated not only by holding office, but by knowing when change serves the greater good.
Yours sincerely,
A concerned supporter